Highlight

2009 Report
HDR 2009 logo
Overcoming barriers:
Human mobility and development

Read more

Human Development Report 2009

Korea (Republic of)

The Human Development Index - going beyond income

Each year since 1990 the Human Development Report has published the human development index (HDI) which looks beyond GDP to a broader definition of well-being. The HDI provides a composite measure of three dimensions of human development: living a long and healthy life (measured by life expectancy), being educated (measured by adult literacy and gross enrolment in education) and having a decent standard of living (measured by purchasing power parity, PPP, income). The index is not in any sense a comprehensive measure of human development. It does not, for example, include important indicators such as gender or income inequality nor more difficult to measure concepts like respect for human rights and political freedoms. What it does provide is a broadened prism for viewing human progress and the complex relationship between income and well-being.

Of the components of the HDI, only income and gross enrolment are somewhat responsive to short term policy changes. For that reason, it is important to examine changes in the human development index over time. The human development index trends tell an important story in that respect. Between 1980 and 2007 Korea (Republic of)'s HDI rose by 0.97% annually from 0.722 to 0.937 today. HDI scores in all regions have increased progressively over the years (Figure 1) although all have experienced periods of slower growth or even reversals.

Figure 1: HDI Trends

This year's HDI, which refers to 2007, highlights the very large gaps in well-being and life chances that continue to divide our increasingly interconnected world. The HDI for Korea (Republic of) is 0.937, which gives the country a rank of 26th out of 182 countries with data (Table 1).

Table 1: Korea (Republic of)’s human development index 2007
HDI value Life expectancy at birth
(years)
Combined gross enrolment ratio
(%)
GDP per capita
(PPP US$)
1. Norway (0.971) 1. Japan (82.7) 1. Australia (114.2) 1. Liechtenstein (85,382)
24. Hong Kong, China (SAR) (0.944) 23. Luxembourg (79.4) 7. Canada (99.3) 33. Slovenia (26,753)
25. Greece (0.942) 24. United Kingdom (79.3) 8. Norway (98.6) 34. Israel (26,315)
26. Korea (Republic of) (0.937) 25. Korea (Republic of) (79.2) 9. Korea (Republic of) (98.5) 35. Korea (Republic of) (24,801)
27. Israel (0.935) 26. United States (79.1) 10. Ireland (97.6) 36. Cyprus (24,789)
28. Andorra (0.934) 27. Greece (79.1) 11. Netherlands (97.5) 37. Czech Republic (24,144)
182. Niger (0.340) 176. Afghanistan (43.6) 177. Djibouti (25.5) 181. Congo (Democratic Republic of the) (298)

By looking at some of the most fundamental aspects of people’s lives and opportunities the HDI provides a much more complete picture of a country's development than other indicators, such as GDP per capita. Figure 2 illustrates that countries on the same level of HDI can have very different levels of income or that countries with similar levels of income can have very different HDIs.

Figure 2: The human development index gives a more complete picture than income

Building the capabilities of women

The HDI measures average achievements in a country, but it does not incorporate the degree of gender imbalance in these achievements. The gender-related development index (GDI), introduced in Human Development Report 1995, measures achievements in the same dimensions using the same indicators as the HDI but captures inequalities in achievement between women and men. It is simply the HDI adjusted downward for gender inequality. The greater the gender disparity in basic human development, the lower is a country's GDI relative to its HDI.

Korea (Republic of)'s GDI value, 0.926 should be compared to its HDI value of 0.937. Its GDI value is 98.8% of its HDI value. Out of the 155 countries with both HDI and GDI values, 97 countries have a better ratio than Korea (Republic of)'s.

Table 2 shows how Korea (Republic of)’s ratio of GDI to HDI compares to other countries, and also shows its values for selected underlying indicators in the calculation of the GDI.

Table 2: The GDI compared to the HDI – a measure of gender disparity
GDI as % of HDI Life expectancy at birth
(years)
2004
Combined primary, secondary and tertiary gross enrolment ratio
2004

Female as % male Female as % male
1. Mongolia (100.0%) 1. Russian Federation (121.7%) 1. Cuba (121.0%)
96. Guatemala (98.9%) 44. Angola (108.9%) 146. Turkey (87.6%)
97. Sao Tome and Principe (98.8%) 45. Nicaragua (108.8%) 147. Morocco (86.1%)
98. Korea (Republic of) (98.8%) 46. Korea (Republic of) (108.8%) 148. Korea (Republic of) (85.7%)
99. Congo (98.8%) 47. Portugal (108.7%) 149. Liechtenstein (84.7%)
100. Djibouti (98.8%) 48. Albania (108.6%) 150. Mozambique (84.4%)
155. Afghanistan (88.0%) 190. Swaziland (98.0%) 175. Afghanistan (55.6%)

The gender empowerment measure (GEM) reveals whether women take an active part in economic and political life. It tracks the share of seats in parliament held by women; of female legislators, senior officials and managers; and of female professional and technical workers- and the gender disparity in earned income, reflecting economic independence. Differing from the GDI, the GEM exposes inequality in opportunities in selected areas.

Korea (Republic of) ranks 61st out of 109 countries in the GEM, with a value of 0.554.

Migration

Every year, millions of people cross national or international borders seeking better living standards. Most migrants, internal and international, reap gains in the form of higher incomes, better access to education and health, and improved prospects for their children. Most of the world’s 195 million international migrants have moved from one developing country to another or between developed countries.

Korea (Republic of) has an emigration rate of 3.1%. The major continent of destination for migrants from Korea (Republic of) is Northern America with 50.3% of emigrants living there.

Table 3: Emigrants
Origin of migrants Emigration rate (%) Major continent of destination for migrants (%)
1. Antigua and Barbuda 45.3 Asia 46.6
5. Samoa 37.2 Northern America 16.6
112. Philippines 4.0 Northern America 49.9
126. Malaysia 3.1 Asia 66.8
127. Korea (Republic of) 3.1 Northern America 50.3
136. Timor-Leste 2.6 Asia 39.5
138. Viet Nam 2.4 Northern America 57.4
181. Mongolia 0.3 Europe 40.7
Global aggregates
OECD 3.9 Northern America 41.2
Very high human development 3.4 Europe 39.2
World 3.0 Europe 33.4

The United States is host to nearly 40 million international migrants – more than any other country though as a share of total population it is Qatar which has the most migrants – more than 4 in every 5 people are migrants. In Korea (Republic of), there are 551.2 thousand migrants which represent 1.2% of the total population.

Table 4: Immigrants
Destination of migrants Immigrant stock (thousands) Destination of migrants Immigrants as a share of population (%) 2005
1. United States 39,266.5 1. Qatar 80.5
16. Hong Kong, China (SAR) 2,721.1 8. Hong Kong, China (SAR) 39.5
39. Thailand 982.0 134. Solomon Islands 1.4
61. China 590.3 139. Timor-Leste 1.2
63. Korea (Republic of) 551.2 141. Korea (Republic of) 1.2
76. Philippines 374.8 142. Tonga 1.1
82. Cambodia 303.9 159. Vanuatu 0.5
182. Vanuatu 1.0 182. China 0.0
Global aggregates
OECD 97,622.8 OECD 8.4
Very high human development 107,625.9 Very high human development 11.1
World 195,245.4 World 3.0

Remittances

Remittances, which are usually sent to immediate family members who have stayed behind, are among the most direct benefits from migration; their benefits spread broadly into local economies. They also serve as foreign exchange earnings for the origin countries of migrants. However, remittances are unequally distributed. Of the total US$370 billion remitted in 2007, more than half went to countries in the medium human development category against less than one per cent to low human development countries. In 2007, US$1,128 million in remittances were sent to Korea (Republic of). Average remittances per person were US$23, compared with the average for OECD of US$108. (See Table 5 for more details.)

Table 5: Remittances
Total remittance inflows
(US$ millions)
Remittances per capita
(US$)
1. India 35,262 1. Luxembourg 3,355
2. China 32,833 3. Tonga 992
47. Malaysia 1,700 115. China 25
49. Thailand 1,635 116. Cambodia 24
62. Korea (Republic of) 1,128 117. Korea (Republic of) 23
91. Cambodia 353 119. Vanuatu 22
92. Hong Kong, China (SAR) 348 149. Myanmar 3
155. Lao People's Democratic Republic 1 154. Lao People's Democratic Republic 0
157. Burundi 0 157. Burundi 0
Global aggregates
OECD 124,520 OECD 108
Very high human development 87,161 Very high human development 92
World 370,765 World 58

Korea (Republic of) was mentioned in the Report in pages 22, 29, 38, 40, 42, 43, 87, 90, 102, 103, 114, and 115.
Use this link to access the complete set of country data.