Highlight

2009 Report
HDR 2009 logo
Overcoming barriers:
Human mobility and development

Read more

Human Development Report 2009

Papua New Guinea

The Human Development Index - going beyond income

Each year since 1990 the Human Development Report has published the human development index (HDI) which looks beyond GDP to a broader definition of well-being. The HDI provides a composite measure of three dimensions of human development: living a long and healthy life (measured by life expectancy), being educated (measured by adult literacy and gross enrolment in education) and having a decent standard of living (measured by purchasing power parity, PPP, income). The index is not in any sense a comprehensive measure of human development. It does not, for example, include important indicators such as gender or income inequality nor more difficult to measure concepts like respect for human rights and political freedoms. What it does provide is a broadened prism for viewing human progress and the complex relationship between income and well-being.

Of the components of the HDI, only income and gross enrolment are somewhat responsive to short term policy changes. For that reason, it is important to examine changes in the human development index over time. The human development index trends tell an important story in that respect. Between 1980 and 2007 Papua New Guinea's HDI rose by 0.95% annually from 0.418 to 0.541 today. HDI scores in all regions have increased progressively over the years (Figure 1) although all have experienced periods of slower growth or even reversals.

Figure 1: HDI Trends

This year's HDI, which refers to 2007, highlights the very large gaps in well-being and life chances that continue to divide our increasingly interconnected world. The HDI for Papua New Guinea is 0.541, which gives the country a rank of 148th out of 182 countries with data (Table 1).

Table 1: Papua New Guinea’s human development index 2007
HDI value Life expectancy at birth
(years)
Adult literacy rate
(% ages 15 and above)
Combined gross enrolment ratio
(%)
GDP per capita
(PPP US$)
1. Norway (0.971) 1. Japan (82.7) 1. Georgia (100.0) 1. Australia (114.2) 1. Liechtenstein (85,382)
146. Bangladesh (0.543) 133. Haiti (61.0) 127. Burundi (59.3) 165. Sierra Leone (44.6) 136. Cameroon (2,128)
147. Kenya (0.541) 134. Timor-Leste (60.7) 128. Yemen (58.9) 166. Senegal (41.2) 137. Sudan (2,086)
148. Papua New Guinea (0.541) 135. Papua New Guinea (60.7) 129. Papua New Guinea (57.8) 167. Papua New Guinea (40.7) 138. Papua New Guinea (2,084)
149. Haiti (0.532) 136. Cambodia (60.6) 130. Nepal (56.5) 168. Sudan (39.9) 139. Djibouti (2,061)
150. Sudan (0.531) 137. Namibia (60.4) 131. Mauritania (55.8) 169. Pakistan (39.3) 140. Kyrgyzstan (2,006)
182. Niger (0.340) 176. Afghanistan (43.6) 151. Mali (26.2) 177. Djibouti (25.5) 181. Congo (Democratic Republic of the) (298)

By looking at some of the most fundamental aspects of people’s lives and opportunities the HDI provides a much more complete picture of a country's development than other indicators, such as GDP per capita. Figure 2 illustrates that countries on the same level of HDI can have very different levels of income or that countries with similar levels of income can have very different HDIs.

Figure 2: The human development index gives a more complete picture than income

Human poverty: focusing on the most deprived in multiple dimensions of poverty

The HDI measures the average progress of a country in human development. The Human Poverty Index (HPI-1), focuses on the proportion of people below certain threshold levels in each of the dimensions of the human development index - living a long and healthy life, having access to education, and a decent standard of living. By looking beyond income deprivation, the HPI-1 represents a multi-dimensional alternative to the $1.25 a day (PPP US$) poverty measure.

The HPI-1 value of 39.6% for Papua New Guinea, ranks 121st among 135 countries for which the index has been calculated.

The HPI-1 measures severe deprivation in health by the proportion of people who are not expected to survive to age 40. Education is measured by the adult illiteracy rate. And a decent standard of living is measured by the unweighted average of people not using an improved water source and the proportion of children under age 5 who are underweight for their age. Table 2 shows the values for these variables for Papua New Guinea and compares them to other countries.


Table 2: Selected indicators of human poverty for Papua New Guinea
Human Poverty Index
(HPI-1)
Probability of not surviving to age 40
(%)
Adult illiteracy rate
(%ages 15 and above)
People not using an improved water source
(%)
Children underweight for age
(% aged under 5)
1. Czech Republic (1.5) 1. Hong Kong, China (SAR) (1.4) 1. Georgia (0.0) 1. Barbados (0) 1. Croatia (1)
119. Côte d'Ivoire (37.4) 105. India (15.5) 127. Burundi (40.7) 147. Mozambique (58) 119. Mauritania (32)
120. Congo (Democratic Republic of the) (38.0) 106. Yemen (15.6) 128. Yemen (41.1) 148. Niger (58) 120. Mali (33)
121. Papua New Guinea (39.6) 107. Papua New Guinea (15.9) 129. Papua New Guinea (42.2) 149. Papua New Guinea (60) 121. Papua New Guinea (35)
122. Timor-Leste (40.8) 108. Timor-Leste (18.0) 130. Nepal (43.5) 150. Afghanistan (78) 122. Cambodia (36)
123. Gambia (40.9) 109. Eritrea (18.2) 131. Mauritania (44.2) 123. Chad (37)
135. Afghanistan (59.8) 153. Lesotho (47.4) 151. Mali (73.8) 138. Bangladesh (48)

Migration

Every year, millions of people cross national or international borders seeking better living standards. Most migrants, internal and international, reap gains in the form of higher incomes, better access to education and health, and improved prospects for their children. Most of the world’s 195 million international migrants have moved from one developing country to another or between developed countries.

Papua New Guinea has an emigration rate of 0.9%. The major continent of destination for migrants from Papua New Guinea is Asia with 8.9% of emigrants living there.

Table 3: Emigrants
Origin of migrants Emigration rate (%) Major continent of destination for migrants (%)
1. Antigua and Barbuda 45.3 Asia 46.6
5. Samoa 37.2 Northern America 16.6
157. Thailand 1.3 Asia 60.1
164. Solomon Islands 1.0 Europe 11.4
167. Papua New Guinea 0.9 Asia 8.9
168. Indonesia 0.9 Asia 77.5
175. Myanmar 0.7 Asia 77.6
181. Mongolia 0.3 Europe 40.7
Global aggregates
Medium human development 1.9 Asia 43.3
OECD 3.9 Northern America 41.2
World 3.0 Europe 33.4

The United States is host to nearly 40 million international migrants – more than any other country though as a share of total population it is Qatar which has the most migrants – more than 4 in every 5 people are migrants. In Papua New Guinea, there are 25.5 thousand migrants which represent 0.4% of the total population.

Table 4: Immigrants
Destination of migrants Immigrant stock (thousands) Destination of migrants Immigrants as a share of population (%) 2005
1. United States 39,266.5 1. Qatar 80.5
16. Hong Kong, China (SAR) 2,721.1 8. Hong Kong, China (SAR) 39.5
123. Myanmar 93.2 159. Vanuatu 0.5
133. Viet Nam 54.5 160. Philippines 0.4
154. Papua New Guinea 25.5 162. Papua New Guinea 0.4
156. Lao People's Democratic Republic 20.3 165. Mongolia 0.4
159. Fiji 17.2 168. Lao People's Democratic Republic 0.3
182. Vanuatu 1.0 182. China 0.0
Global aggregates
OECD 97,622.8 OECD 8.4
Medium human development 40,948.6 Medium human development 0.8
World 195,245.4 World 3.0

Remittances

Remittances, which are usually sent to immediate family members who have stayed behind, are among the most direct benefits from migration; their benefits spread broadly into local economies. They also serve as foreign exchange earnings for the origin countries of migrants. However, remittances are unequally distributed. Of the total US$370 billion remitted in 2007, more than half went to countries in the medium human development category against less than one per cent to low human development countries. In 2007, US$13 million in remittances were sent to Papua New Guinea. Average remittances per person were US$2, compared with the average for OECD of US$108. (See Table 5 for more details.)

Table 5: Remittances
Total remittance inflows
(US$ millions)
Remittances per capita
(US$)
1. India 35,262 1. Luxembourg 3,355
2. China 32,833 3. Tonga 992
117. Tonga 100 119. Vanuatu 22
140. Solomon Islands 20 149. Myanmar 3
145. Papua New Guinea 13 150. Papua New Guinea 2
150. Vanuatu 5 154. Lao People's Democratic Republic 0
155. Lao People's Democratic Republic 1
157. Burundi 0 157. Burundi 0
Global aggregates
OECD 124,520 OECD 108
Medium human development 189,093 Medium human development 44
World 370,765 World 58

Papua New Guinea was mentioned in the Report in pages 55 and 77.
Use this link to access the complete set of country data.