Highlight

2009 Report
HDR 2009 logo
Overcoming barriers:
Human mobility and development

Read more

Human Development Report 2009

Sweden

The Human Development Index - going beyond income

Each year since 1990 the Human Development Report has published the human development index (HDI) which looks beyond GDP to a broader definition of well-being. The HDI provides a composite measure of three dimensions of human development: living a long and healthy life (measured by life expectancy), being educated (measured by adult literacy and gross enrolment in education) and having a decent standard of living (measured by purchasing power parity, PPP, income). The index is not in any sense a comprehensive measure of human development. It does not, for example, include important indicators such as gender or income inequality nor more difficult to measure concepts like respect for human rights and political freedoms. What it does provide is a broadened prism for viewing human progress and the complex relationship between income and well-being.

Of the components of the HDI, only income and gross enrolment are somewhat responsive to short term policy changes. For that reason, it is important to examine changes in the human development index over time. The human development index trends tell an important story in that respect. Between 1980 and 2007 Sweden's HDI rose by 0.32% annually from 0.885 to 0.963 today. HDI scores in all regions have increased progressively over the years (Figure 1) although all have experienced periods of slower growth or even reversals.

Figure 1: HDI Trends

This year's HDI, which refers to 2007, highlights the very large gaps in well-being and life chances that continue to divide our increasingly interconnected world. The HDI for Sweden is 0.963, which gives the country a rank of 7th out of 182 countries with data (Table 1).

Table 1: Sweden’s human development index 2007
HDI value Life expectancy at birth
(years)
Combined gross enrolment ratio
(%)
GDP per capita
(PPP US$)
1. Norway (0.971) 1. Japan (82.7) 1. Australia (114.2) 1. Liechtenstein (85,382)
5. Ireland (0.965) 6. Italy (81.1) 16. Luxembourg (94.4) 14. Netherlands (38,694)
6. Netherlands (0.964) 7. France (81.0) 17. Belgium (94.3) 15. Austria (37,370)
7. Sweden (0.963) 8. Sweden (80.8) 18. Sweden (94.3) 16. Sweden (36,712)
8. France (0.961) 9. Spain (80.7) 19. Barbados (92.9) 17. Denmark (36,130)
9. Switzerland (0.960) 10. Israel (80.7) 20. Slovenia (92.8) 18. Canada (35,812)
182. Niger (0.340) 176. Afghanistan (43.6) 177. Djibouti (25.5) 181. Congo (Democratic Republic of the) (298)

By looking at some of the most fundamental aspects of people’s lives and opportunities the HDI provides a much more complete picture of a country's development than other indicators, such as GDP per capita. Figure 2 illustrates that countries on the same level of HDI can have very different levels of income or that countries with similar levels of income can have very different HDIs.

Figure 2: The human development index gives a more complete picture than income

Building the capabilities of women

The HDI measures average achievements in a country, but it does not incorporate the degree of gender imbalance in these achievements. The gender-related development index (GDI), introduced in Human Development Report 1995, measures achievements in the same dimensions using the same indicators as the HDI but captures inequalities in achievement between women and men. It is simply the HDI adjusted downward for gender inequality. The greater the gender disparity in basic human development, the lower is a country's GDI relative to its HDI.

Sweden's GDI value, 0.956 should be compared to its HDI value of 0.963. Its GDI value is 99.3% of its HDI value. Out of the 155 countries with both HDI and GDI values, 66 countries have a better ratio than Sweden's.

Table 2 shows how Sweden’s ratio of GDI to HDI compares to other countries, and also shows its values for selected underlying indicators in the calculation of the GDI.

Table 2: The GDI compared to the HDI – a measure of gender disparity
GDI as % of HDI Life expectancy at birth
(years)
2004
Combined primary, secondary and tertiary gross enrolment ratio
2004

Female as % male Female as % male
1. Mongolia (100.0%) 1. Russian Federation (121.7%) 1. Cuba (121.0%)
65. Italy (99.3%) 125. Netherlands (105.5%) 19. Russian Federation (110.4%)
66. Malta (99.3%) 126. Sudan (105.5%) 20. Jamaica (110.3%)
67. Sweden (99.3%) 127. Sweden (105.5%) 21. Sweden (110.2%)
68. Swaziland (99.3%) 128. Chad (105.5%) 22. United States (110.0%)
69. New Zealand (99.3%) 129. Madagascar (105.5%) 23. Honduras (109.9%)
155. Afghanistan (88.0%) 190. Swaziland (98.0%) 175. Afghanistan (55.6%)

The gender empowerment measure (GEM) reveals whether women take an active part in economic and political life. It tracks the share of seats in parliament held by women; of female legislators, senior officials and managers; and of female professional and technical workers- and the gender disparity in earned income, reflecting economic independence. Differing from the GDI, the GEM exposes inequality in opportunities in selected areas.

Sweden ranks 1st out of 109 countries in the GEM, with a value of 0.909.

Migration

Every year, millions of people cross national or international borders seeking better living standards. Most migrants, internal and international, reap gains in the form of higher incomes, better access to education and health, and improved prospects for their children. Most of the world’s 195 million international migrants have moved from one developing country to another or between developed countries.

Sweden has an emigration rate of 3.3%. The major continent of destination for migrants from Sweden is Europe with 65.5% of emigrants living there.

Table 3: Emigrants
Origin of migrants Emigration rate (%) Major continent of destination for migrants (%)
1. Antigua and Barbuda 45.3 Asia 46.6
20. Ireland 20.0 Europe 69.2
113. Canada 4.0 Northern America 72.7
114. Norway 3.9 Europe 62.1
123. Sweden 3.3 Europe 65.5
125. Spain 3.2 Europe 61.2
129. France 2.9 Europe 54.5
174. Japan 0.7 Northern America 59.5
181. Mongolia 0.3 Europe 40.7
Global aggregates
OECD 3.9 Northern America 41.2
Very high human development 3.4 Europe 39.2
World 3.0 Europe 33.4

The United States is host to nearly 40 million international migrants – more than any other country though as a share of total population it is Qatar which has the most migrants – more than 4 in every 5 people are migrants. In Sweden, there are 1,112.9 thousand migrants which represent 12.3% of the total population.

Table 4: Immigrants
Destination of migrants Immigrant stock (thousands) Destination of migrants Immigrants as a share of population (%) 2005
1. United States 39,266.5 1. Qatar 80.5
1. United States 39,266.5 4. Andorra 63.1
27. Switzerland 1,659.7 34. United States 13.0
34. Austria 1,156.3 35. Germany 12.9
35. Sweden 1,112.9 37. Sweden 12.3
40. Greece 975.0 41. Spain 10.7
42. Belgium 882.1 42. Netherlands 10.6
164. Liechtenstein 11.9 129. Japan 1.6
182. Vanuatu 1.0 182. China 0.0
Global aggregates
OECD 97,622.8 OECD 8.4
Very high human development 107,625.9 Very high human development 11.1
World 195,245.4 World 3.0

Remittances

Remittances, which are usually sent to immediate family members who have stayed behind, are among the most direct benefits from migration; their benefits spread broadly into local economies. They also serve as foreign exchange earnings for the origin countries of migrants. However, remittances are unequally distributed. Of the total US$370 billion remitted in 2007, more than half went to countries in the medium human development category against less than one per cent to low human development countries. In 2007, US$775 million in remittances were sent to Sweden. Average remittances per person were US$85, compared with the average for OECD of US$108. (See Table 5 for more details.)

Table 5: Remittances
Total remittance inflows
(US$ millions)
Remittances per capita
(US$)
1. India 35,262 1. Luxembourg 3,355
5. France 13,746 1. Luxembourg 3,355
65. Israel 1,041 70. Norway 130
66. Denmark 989 73. Germany 104
73. Sweden 775 80. Sweden 85
74. Finland 772 94. Italy 54
78. New Zealand 650 132. Japan 12
130. Iceland 41 134. United States 10
157. Burundi 0 157. Burundi 0
Global aggregates
OECD 124,520 OECD 108
Very high human development 87,161 Very high human development 92
World 370,765 World 58

Sweden was mentioned in the Report in pages 4, 29, 32, 38, 56, 58, 59, 61, 87, 90, 97, 98, 104, 111, 114, 115, 116, 117, and 118.
Use this link to access the complete set of country data.