Destacado

Informe 2009
HDR 2009 logo
Overcoming barriers:
Human mobility and development
Mas información

Human Development Report 2009

Estonia

The Human Development Index - going beyond income

Each year since 1990 the Human Development Report has published the human development index (HDI) which looks beyond GDP to a broader definition of well-being. The HDI provides a composite measure of three dimensions of human development: living a long and healthy life (measured by life expectancy), being educated (measured by adult literacy and gross enrolment in education) and having a decent standard of living (measured by purchasing power parity, PPP, income). The index is not in any sense a comprehensive measure of human development. It does not, for example, include important indicators such as gender or income inequality nor more difficult to measure concepts like respect for human rights and political freedoms. What it does provide is a broadened prism for viewing human progress and the complex relationship between income and well-being.

Of the components of the HDI, only income and gross enrolment are somewhat responsive to short term policy changes. For that reason, it is important to examine changes in the human development index over time. The human development index trends tell an important story in that respect. Between 1990 and 2007 Estonia's HDI rose by 0.46% annually from 0.817 to 0.883 today. HDI scores in all regions have increased progressively over the years (Figure 1) although all have experienced periods of slower growth or even reversals.

Figure 1: HDI Trends

This year's HDI, which refers to 2007, highlights the very large gaps in well-being and life chances that continue to divide our increasingly interconnected world. The HDI for Estonia is 0.883, which gives the country a rank of 40th out of 182 countries with data (Table 1).

Table 1: Estonia’s human development index 2007
HDI value Life expectancy at birth
(years)
Adult literacy rate
(% ages 15 and above)
Combined gross enrolment ratio
(%)
GDP per capita
(PPP US$)
1. Norway (0.971) 1. Japan (82.7) 1. Georgia (100.0) 1. Australia (114.2) 1. Liechtenstein (85,382)
38. Malta (0.902) 69. Bulgaria (73.1) 2. Cuba (99.8) 23. Italy (91.8) 41. Oman (22,816)
39. Bahrain (0.895) 70. Peru (73.0) 3. Estonia (99.8) 24. Kazakhstan (91.4) 42. Portugal (22,765)
40. Estonia (0.883) 71. Estonia (72.9) 4. Latvia (99.8) 25. Estonia (91.2) 43. Estonia (20,361)
41. Poland (0.880) 72. China (72.9) 5. Belarus (99.7) 26. Uruguay (90.9) 44. Bahamas (20,253)
42. Slovakia (0.880) 73. Colombia (72.7) 6. Ukraine (99.7) 27. Austria (90.5) 45. Slovakia (20,076)
182. Niger (0.340) 176. Afghanistan (43.6) 151. Mali (26.2) 177. Djibouti (25.5) 181. Congo (Democratic Republic of the) (298)

By looking at some of the most fundamental aspects of people’s lives and opportunities the HDI provides a much more complete picture of a country's development than other indicators, such as GDP per capita. Figure 2 illustrates that countries on the same level of HDI can have very different levels of income or that countries with similar levels of income can have very different HDIs.

Figure 2: The human development index gives a more complete picture than income

Building the capabilities of women

The HDI measures average achievements in a country, but it does not incorporate the degree of gender imbalance in these achievements. The gender-related development index (GDI), introduced in Human Development Report 1995, measures achievements in the same dimensions using the same indicators as the HDI but captures inequalities in achievement between women and men. It is simply the HDI adjusted downward for gender inequality. The greater the gender disparity in basic human development, the lower is a country's GDI relative to its HDI.

Estonia's GDI value, 0.882 should be compared to its HDI value of 0.883. Its GDI value is 99.9% of its HDI value. Out of the 155 countries with both HDI and GDI values, 13 countries have a better ratio than Estonia's.

Table 2 shows how Estonia’s ratio of GDI to HDI compares to other countries, and also shows its values for selected underlying indicators in the calculation of the GDI.

Table 2: The GDI compared to the HDI – a measure of gender disparity
GDI as % of HDI Life expectancy at birth
(years)
2004
Adult literacy rate
(% ages 15 and older)
2004
Combined primary, secondary and tertiary gross enrolment ratio
2004

Female as % male Female as % male Female as % male
1. Mongolia (100.0%) 1. Russian Federation (121.7%) 1. Lesotho (122.5%) 1. Cuba (121.0%)
12. Kazakhstan (99.8%) 5. Lithuania (117.9%) 17. Tonga (100.1%) 4. Latvia (117.1%)
13. Belarus (99.8%) 6. Ukraine (117.7%) 18. Argentina (100.1%) 5. Barbados (116.7%)
14. Estonia (99.8%) 7. Estonia (116.3%) 19. Estonia (100.0%) 6. Estonia (116.1%)
15. Thailand (99.8%) 8. Latvia (114.9%) 20. Lithuania (100.0%) 7. Mongolia (115.1%)
16. Rwanda (99.8%) 9. El Salvador (114.3%) 21. Latvia (100.0%) 8. Kuwait (114.9%)
155. Afghanistan (88.0%) 190. Swaziland (98.0%) 145. Afghanistan (29.2%) 175. Afghanistan (55.6%)

The gender empowerment measure (GEM) reveals whether women take an active part in economic and political life. It tracks the share of seats in parliament held by women; of female legislators, senior officials and managers; and of female professional and technical workers- and the gender disparity in earned income, reflecting economic independence. Differing from the GDI, the GEM exposes inequality in opportunities in selected areas.

Estonia ranks 30th out of 109 countries in the GEM, with a value of 0.665.

Migration

Every year, millions of people cross national or international borders seeking better living standards. Most migrants, internal and international, reap gains in the form of higher incomes, better access to education and health, and improved prospects for their children. Most of the world’s 195 million international migrants have moved from one developing country to another or between developed countries.

Estonia has an emigration rate of 12.2%. The major continent of destination for migrants from Estonia is Europe with 81.1% of emigrants living there.

Table 3: Emigrants
Origin of migrants Emigration rate (%) Major continent of destination for migrants (%)
1. Antigua and Barbuda 45.3 Asia 46.6
13. Bosnia and Herzegovina 25.1 Europe 82.7
35. Azerbaijan 14.3 Europe 74.3
36. Serbia 13.6 Europe 72.3
44. Estonia 12.2 Europe 81.1
45. Croatia 12.0 Europe 72.2
48. Tajikistan 11.4 Europe 55.6
120. Czech Republic 3.5 Europe 66.9
181. Mongolia 0.3 Europe 40.7
Global aggregates
Central and Eastern Europe and the CIS 9.5 Europe 69.9
High human development 6.0 Europe 43.8
World 3.0 Europe 33.4

The United States is host to nearly 40 million international migrants – more than any other country though as a share of total population it is Qatar which has the most migrants – more than 4 in every 5 people are migrants. In Estonia, there are 201.7 thousand migrants which represent 15.0% of the total population.

Table 4: Immigrants
Destination of migrants Immigrant stock (thousands) Destination of migrants Immigrants as a share of population (%) 2005
1. United States 39,266.5 1. Qatar 80.5
2. Russian Federation 12,079.6 20. Kazakhstan 19.6
87. Azerbaijan 254.5 24. Latvia 16.6
93. Turkmenistan 223.7 25. Armenia 16.1
96. Estonia 201.7 27. Estonia 15.0
97. Georgia 191.2 28. Croatia 14.9
103. Slovenia 167.3 32. Cyprus 13.9
165. Malta 11.7 155. Romania 0.6
182. Vanuatu 1.0 182. China 0.0
Global aggregates
Central and Eastern Europe and the CIS 30,993.2 Central and Eastern Europe and the CIS 5.1
High human development 38,078.0 High human development 3.8
World 195,245.4 World 3.0

Remittances

Remittances, which are usually sent to immediate family members who have stayed behind, are among the most direct benefits from migration; their benefits spread broadly into local economies. They also serve as foreign exchange earnings for the origin countries of migrants. However, remittances are unequally distributed. Of the total US$370 billion remitted in 2007, more than half went to countries in the medium human development category against less than one per cent to low human development countries. In 2007, US$426 million in remittances were sent to Estonia. Average remittances per person were US$319, compared with the average for Central and Eastern Europe and the CIS of US$114. (See Table 5 for more details.)

Table 5: Remittances
Total remittance inflows
(US$ millions)
Remittances per capita
(US$)
1. India 35,262 1. Luxembourg 3,355
7. Poland 10,496 7. Bosnia and Herzegovina 640
77. Georgia 696 15. Moldova 395
84. Latvia 552 22. Albania 336
87. Estonia 426 23. Estonia 319
88. Hungary 413 25. Croatia 306
90. Belarus 354 27. Armenia 282
131. Malta 40 129. Kazakhstan 14
157. Burundi 0 157. Burundi 0
Global aggregates
Central and Eastern Europe and the CIS 49,618 Central and Eastern Europe and the CIS 114
High human development 92,453 High human development 101
World 370,765 World 58

Estonia was mentioned in the Report in pages 38, 42, and 88.
Use this link to access the complete set of country data.