Destacado

Informe 2009
HDR 2009 logo
Overcoming barriers:
Human mobility and development
Mas información

Human Development Report 2009

Serbia

The Human Development Index - going beyond income

Each year since 1990 the Human Development Report has published the human development index (HDI) which looks beyond GDP to a broader definition of well-being. The HDI provides a composite measure of three dimensions of human development: living a long and healthy life (measured by life expectancy), being educated (measured by adult literacy and gross enrolment in education) and having a decent standard of living (measured by purchasing power parity, PPP, income). The index is not in any sense a comprehensive measure of human development. It does not, for example, include important indicators such as gender or income inequality nor more difficult to measure concepts like respect for human rights and political freedoms. What it does provide is a broadened prism for viewing human progress and the complex relationship between income and well-being.

Of the components of the HDI, only income and gross enrolment are somewhat responsive to short term policy changes. For that reason, it is important to examine changes in the human development index over time. The human development index trends tell an important story in that respect. Between 2000 and 2007 Serbia's HDI rose by 0.51% annually from 0.797 to 0.826 today. HDI scores in all regions have increased progressively over the years (Figure 1) although all have experienced periods of slower growth or even reversals.

Figure 1: HDI Trends

This year's HDI, which refers to 2007, highlights the very large gaps in well-being and life chances that continue to divide our increasingly interconnected world. The HDI for Serbia is 0.826, which gives the country a rank of 67th out of 182 countries with data (Table 1).

Table 1: Serbia’s human development index 2007
HDI value Life expectancy at birth
(years)
Adult literacy rate
(% ages 15 and above)
Combined gross enrolment ratio
(%)
GDP per capita
(PPP US$)
1. Norway (0.971) 1. Japan (82.7) 1. Georgia (100.0) 1. Australia (114.2) 1. Liechtenstein (85,382)
65. Montenegro (0.834) 58. Montenegro (74.0) 40. Chile (96.5) 82. Armenia (74.6) 73. Costa Rica (10,842)
66. Malaysia (0.829) 59. Sri Lanka (74.0) 41. Montenegro (96.4) 83. Montenegro (74.5) 74. Belarus (10,841)
67. Serbia (0.826) 60. Serbia (73.9) 42. Serbia (96.4) 84. Serbia (74.5) 75. Serbia (10,248)
68. Belarus (0.826) 61. Libyan Arab Jamahiriya (73.8) 43. Grenada (96.0) 85. Hong Kong, China (SAR) (74.4) 76. Lebanon (10,109)
69. Saint Lucia (0.821) 62. Tunisia (73.8) 44. Costa Rica (95.9) 86. Suriname (74.3) 77. Saint Lucia (9,786)
182. Niger (0.340) 176. Afghanistan (43.6) 151. Mali (26.2) 177. Djibouti (25.5) 181. Congo (Democratic Republic of the) (298)

By looking at some of the most fundamental aspects of people’s lives and opportunities the HDI provides a much more complete picture of a country's development than other indicators, such as GDP per capita. Figure 2 illustrates that countries on the same level of HDI can have very different levels of income or that countries with similar levels of income can have very different HDIs.

Figure 2: The human development index gives a more complete picture than income

Human poverty: focusing on the most deprived in multiple dimensions of poverty

The HDI measures the average progress of a country in human development. The Human Poverty Index (HPI-1), focuses on the proportion of people below certain threshold levels in each of the dimensions of the human development index - living a long and healthy life, having access to education, and a decent standard of living. By looking beyond income deprivation, the HPI-1 represents a multi-dimensional alternative to the $1.25 a day (PPP US$) poverty measure.

The HPI-1 value of 3.1% for Serbia, ranks 7th among 135 countries for which the index has been calculated.

The HPI-1 measures severe deprivation in health by the proportion of people who are not expected to survive to age 40. Education is measured by the adult illiteracy rate. And a decent standard of living is measured by the unweighted average of people not using an improved water source and the proportion of children under age 5 who are underweight for their age. Table 2 shows the values for these variables for Serbia and compares them to other countries.


Table 2: Selected indicators of human poverty for Serbia
Human Poverty Index
(HPI-1)
Probability of not surviving to age 40
(%)
Adult illiteracy rate
(%ages 15 and above)
People not using an improved water source
(%)
Children underweight for age
(% aged under 5)
1. Czech Republic (1.5) 1. Hong Kong, China (SAR) (1.4) 1. Georgia (0.0) 1. Barbados (0) 1. Croatia (1)
5. Bosnia and Herzegovina (2.8) 23. Chile (3.1) 40. Chile (3.5) 19. Uruguay (0) 5. Ukraine (1)
6. Uruguay (3.0) 24. Grenada (3.2) 41. Montenegro (3.6) 20. Saint Kitts and Nevis (1) 6. Bosnia and Herzegovina (2)
7. Serbia (3.1) 25. Serbia (3.3) 42. Serbia (3.6) 21. Serbia (1) 7. Serbia (2)
8. Montenegro (3.1) 26. Costa Rica (3.3) 43. Grenada (4.0) 22. Malaysia (1) 8. Hungary (2)
9. The former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia (3.2) 27. The former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia (3.4) 44. Costa Rica (4.1) 23. Latvia (1) 9. Montenegro (3)
135. Afghanistan (59.8) 153. Lesotho (47.4) 151. Mali (73.8) 150. Afghanistan (78) 138. Bangladesh (48)

Migration

Every year, millions of people cross national or international borders seeking better living standards. Most migrants, internal and international, reap gains in the form of higher incomes, better access to education and health, and improved prospects for their children. Most of the world’s 195 million international migrants have moved from one developing country to another or between developed countries.

Serbia has an emigration rate of 13.6%. The major continent of destination for migrants from Serbia is Europe with 72.3% of emigrants living there.

Table 3: Emigrants
Origin of migrants Emigration rate (%) Major continent of destination for migrants (%)
1. Antigua and Barbuda 45.3 Asia 46.6
13. Bosnia and Herzegovina 25.1 Europe 82.7
33. Moldova 14.3 Europe 86.7
35. Azerbaijan 14.3 Europe 74.3
36. Serbia 13.6 Europe 72.3
44. Estonia 12.2 Europe 81.1
45. Croatia 12.0 Europe 72.2
120. Czech Republic 3.5 Europe 66.9
181. Mongolia 0.3 Europe 40.7
Global aggregates
Central and Eastern Europe and the CIS 9.5 Europe 69.9
High human development 6.0 Europe 43.8
World 3.0 Europe 33.4

The United States is host to nearly 40 million international migrants – more than any other country though as a share of total population it is Qatar which has the most migrants – more than 4 in every 5 people are migrants. In Serbia, there are 674.6 thousand migrants which represent 6.8% of the total population.

Table 4: Immigrants
Destination of migrants Immigrant stock (thousands) Destination of migrants Immigrants as a share of population (%) 2005
1. United States 39,266.5 1. Qatar 80.5
2. Russian Federation 12,079.6 20. Kazakhstan 19.6
36. Belarus 1,106.9 55. Russian Federation 8.4
44. Poland 825.4 56. Slovenia 8.4
53. Serbia 674.6 64. Serbia 6.8
55. Croatia 661.4 69. The former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia 5.9
64. Armenia 492.6 72. Kyrgyzstan 5.5
165. Malta 11.7 155. Romania 0.6
182. Vanuatu 1.0 182. China 0.0
Global aggregates
Central and Eastern Europe and the CIS 30,993.2 Central and Eastern Europe and the CIS 5.1
High human development 38,078.0 High human development 3.8
World 195,245.4 World 3.0

Serbia was mentioned in the Report in pages 29, 59, and 90.
Use this link to access the complete set of country data.